At a very basic level, you could argue “not much”, because the core mission of providing power through a handy plug doesn’t differ just because you’re using a GaN charger. Plug it into the wall, plug it into your device, no change there.
However, the nature of the crystal structures in a GaN charger does give them some particular advantages over traditional charger technologies. The critical one here is size, because it’s possible to safely and efficiently pack in circuitry in arrangements that allow for a higher power throughput relative to the size of the charger than you would see in a standard charger.
If you’ve ever had one of those laptops with a charger that seems to weigh as much as the laptop itself and is about half the size, you’ll be aware that some higher power chargers can be on the large side. GaN chargers can pull through as much power safely as those larger sized devices in a plug that’s considerably smaller and lighter, making them much more portable. The nature of those crystal arrays means that a comparable GaN charger outputs less heat than a standard charger, which can also have an impact on overall charger efficiency as well.
Many GaN chargers also comply with the PD (Power Delivery) standard, which means as long as they’re rated for the right level of power output, a single GaN charger could power not only your phone or your headphones, but also your tablet or laptop.
One important caveat to throw into the GaN charger debate however, is to point out that a GaN charger won’t (by itself) charge your device “faster” to speak of. Charging speeds are a joint function of the power output of the charger but also the level of power input that your device can actually take. Let’s give this some practical numbers to illustrate.
Say you’ve got an Apple iPhone 15. Apple’s official specifications for the iPhone 15 calls for a 20W or higher charger to get optimal charging speeds, with most analysis suggesting that it’ll top out around 27W in terms of real world charging. That’s not an official Apple figure – it just simply never states it – but let’s go with it as our figure here.
If you’ve got an existing 45W PD charger, it’ll regulate the charging up to that 27W figure, no faster, but whether it’s silicon, GaN or made out of fairy bread – presuming that were feasible – wouldn’t actually matter. The charging rate would be the same, because it’s more controlled by the phone in this scenario, though we strongly suspect the fairy bread would catch fire in this hypothetical example.
Where you would see an improvement in charging speeds is if you were still relying on an older plug adapter capable, of 5-10W, for example. There a GaN charger could ramp up to that 27W (theoretical) speed and power up your phone considerably faster.